Gemic

Author: Aija-Rose Farnill

Our ‘New Normal’—The Sensory Landscape

Posted on by Aija-Rose Farnill

This piece was originally published on EPIC Perspectives in 2021.

Sanitization has been a key word during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sanitization not just in terms of cleanliness, but also in terms of the revised interactions people have had with each other and with the environment around them. COVID-19 has created a Sanitized Landscape – supposedly free of germs in the home, cars on the road, and close encounters with other bodies.

As parts of the world slowly prepare for a ‘new normal’ post-pandemic, we propose that a fundamental part of this preparing involves looking not through the lens of a Sanitized Landscape, but a Sensory Landscape. This combines traditional senses of smell, taste, touch, sight, and hearing with metaphysical perception – senses beyond the traditional that help people feel a sense of safety, comfort, connectedness, and well-being.

This shift from a Sanitized to Sensory Landscape makes us excited to start making sense of one big question: In a ‘new normal’ post-pandemic world, what kind of sensory experience(s) will consumers value, and why?

Why a Sensory Landscape?

The pandemic has had a profound impact on people’s senses. Over 50% of those diagnosed with COVID-19 have experienced a loss of smell and taste (Campbell, 2021). In the UK, over 200,000 patients have experienced smell loss, and about half of those affected are still experiencing difficulties two months later (Cox, 2020). Many have been deprived of other important sensory experiences – like the ability to reach out to others and feel a sense of connectedness to the people and things around them that matter. The Well Being Trust estimates that COVID-19’s role in social isolation and economic pressures will contribute up to approximately 150,000 additional deaths (Petterson et al., 2020).

Overall, this experience has created a greater awareness and appreciation of how human senses, both traditional and metaphysical, contribute to the profundity of daily life: from the delectable tastes and smells of a good home-cooked meal, to the joy and comfort of human interaction, to the privilege of being able to fully immerse ourselves in the sensory experiences of different cultures through travel.

Amidst this greater awareness, the shift from a Sanitized to Sensory Landscape becomes an opportunity for brands and people to help make sense of post-pandemic times and have confidence and hope in a ‘new normal’ together. 

Making Sense of a Sensory Landscape

The underlying principle of shifting from a Sanitized Landscape to a Sensory Landscape is to shift focus from the things that we have tried to make our environments free of during this period – like cars or germs or even people – to a focus on what we now want them to be filled with. Post-pandemic, people will want more experiences through products, user experiences, or environments (physical, digital, or both) that activate and enliven the senses.

To kickstart this essential thinking around sensemaking in a Sensory Landscape, we need to tap into the traditional and metaphysical domains of sensing. Our provocations are:

  1. People are developing a renewed appreciation and relationship with their traditional senses. It is therefore paramount that new experiences favor sensorial sensitivity – moving beyond the current paradigm of offering frictionless experiences.
  2. People are seeking to re-establish a sense of connectedness, comfort, and well-being in a post-pandemic ‘new normal’. It is therefore crucial that new sensory experiences factor in metaphysical perception – taking a systemic view on how people’s traditional senses interact with their surrounding physical and social environments.

Favoring Sensorial Sensitivity

Creating frictionless, end-to-end experiences is often a desired design principle for emerging human interactions in brand activations and retail experiences. However, by aiming for frictionless experiences, we aim for a “free from” narrative – free from hassle, free from pain points – and risk normalizing what are ultimately short-term solutions exacerbated by COVID-19 that do not tackle larger systemic issues. These range from something as ‘simplistic’ as promoting frictionless interactions through touch-free movements, to pushing for frictionless end-to-end patient journeys as a long-term marker of effective and equitable care which may encourage one generalized patient journey rather than a personalized, care-first one (Lafleur, 2018)

In our ‘new normal’, we must realize that experiences are made memorable not by being frictionless, but by their sensorial sensitivity – the ability to sensitively amplify multisensory interactions into desirable and locally contextual experiences.

Brands need to interact more dynamically and holistically with the senses and not rely on a frictionless approach. In our ‘new normal’, brands must realize that experiences are made memorable not by being frictionless, but by their sensorial sensitivity – the ability to sensitively amplify multisensory interactions into desirable experiences.

Favoring sensorial sensitivity also involves adapting sensory experiences to different cultural and social contexts. Researchers led by Professor Asifa Majid (2018) highlighted that whereas English speakers generally conformed to our previously established hierarchy of senses – sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell – Farsi and Lao speakers in the study were almost perfectly able to talk about and identify tastes, whereas English speakers struggled. In industries where multisensory experiences are still often based on an underlying hierarchy of senses, this has significant implications for how brands create future locally contextual customer engagement strategies.

At Gemic, we’ve integrated the multi-sensorial approach into multiple topics: from aiding caregiver-child bonding and infant development through experiences that go beyond the tactile, to looking at how consumers form “sonic identities” through broader visual and tactile cues. We’ve also started experimenting with presenting our deliverables in new formats – for example, complementing traditional slides and written reports with new “podcast-style” playlists of respondents’ top insights. This also encouraged respondents to think more creatively about how they described their aspirations and motivation – for example, thinking of a sound that encapsulated a sense of achievement for them.

When we observe wider industry developments, we can also see this renewed approach to senses. For example, carmakers are rethinking the soundscapes of cities and cars  and their wider multisensory links with the advent of electric vehicles (De La Garza, 2021). What are the embedded cues in city soundscapes that help us navigate them today, within vehicles and on foot? And how might those be replaced in sensor-driven infrastructure? Emerging technologies are facilitating a shift from frictionless to sensorial digital experiences through developments in haptic sensors that allow users to feel different materials such as forest leaves (The Financial, 2021) or corduroy pants (Garun, 2021) on a screen, a welcome departure from glassy and uniform mediated experiences.

Factor in Metaphysical Perception

In advocating for a more dynamic and culturally contextual understanding of the senses, we must also strive to include the sensations beyond the traditional five pillars of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. We often understand how important our senses are by either coming into contact with them – an (un)pleasant voice, scent, texture, taste, view – or by losing them. Yet we also lack understanding of, or ignore, so much in between; for example, how do we experience senses of safety, belonging, or wellbeing?

Just as we are realising how much we rely on our traditional senses, we are also realising how much we are bound by them.

Metaphysical perception, described as the abstract sensing we do beyond the basic five, is defined by their lack of direct contact. Metaphysical perception is how we combine inputs from our physical senses and the surrounding context to inform our rich ‘lived’ experiences. These induced senses are crucial to detecting the emotion that people, places, and practices carry, including a perception of comfort and safety. In our quest to better understand people’s relationship with places, brands, and experiences, we should not only interpret responses from the tangible observations that we make, but also seek to understand people’s metaphysical responses to capture these experiences more holistically.

For brands mulling over how to factor in metaphysical perception into new sensory experiences, new technology is a great realm to contextualize this. In a virtual reality or augmented reality setting where digital and physical objects intertwine, an understanding beyond the visual, aural, and haptic elements becomes integral to spur feelings of reality (and being comfortable with that reality) in simulated environments. Achieving this means going beyond discourses around balancing the physical and digital ratio of interactivity. Instead, we should be thinking about how metaphysical perception and other forms of abductive reasoning are being recalibrated in ‘new’ experiences in these ‘new’ worlds.

Improving our understanding of metaphysical perception, in all realities, is how we can create a more holistic engagement and relationship with the places we live in. As philosopher Thomas Metzinger (2018, pp.10) writes in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, “there are explicit and implicit assumptions about the structure of reality” that are up to us to extract and interpret for informing our relationships with the world, particularly in reference to virtual reality environments. Metzinger also identifies how the phenomenology of ‘presence’ is stronger when one is socially situated, currently captured in the market through the recent boom of investment in social VR applications. This articulates the growing need for fostering a strong perception of ‘presence’ and thus enhanced personal resonance based on one’s sensorial triggers and relational attachments when designing spaces and experiences. Our work in social technology has seen how metaphysical perception facilitates collective pursuits through their role in establishing familiarity, belonging, and community. We identified the crucial role that shared attention plays in supporting online togetherness. For online group achievement, demonstrations of care, both direct and indirect, help build lasting relationships.

Metaphysical perception also allows us to reconsider our changing bodies as well as our changing environments. Interoception – defined as how people’s brains interpret their body’s internal signals, like their digestive or circulatory system – is offering a more holistic understanding of how people construct their sense of well-being (Robson, 2021). At Gemic, our cultural scans have shown how people are increasingly interested in gut-brain links, turning to new practices of cleaning and eating (such as reduced washing, and paying more attention to active cultures in food) to cultivate healthy bacteria in their gut (and skin) microbiome.

Ultimately, factoring metaphysical perception into engagement strategies is crucial because it gets to what a sense of community, belonging and well-being means on a human level. Strategies informed by metaphysical perception allows brands to better understand not just the way people engage with the world around them, but the way people want the world around them to feel and be. We’ve come across these issues in our cultural scans and ethnographies on well-being, such as people creating new ideas of a comfortable home and workplace through breathability. In our work for a leading appliance manufacturer, we also saw a shift in focus from individual to planetary health, signaling an acknowledgement of the invisible dependencies that shape how we gauge healthy societies.

**

The ‘new’ lived experiences of individuals and communities have been irrevocably shaped by COVID-19. The shift towards a Sensory Landscape should encourage brands and companies alike to approach senses not as a diminished means but a means of deep connection to resonate with people particularly through non-traditional ways of sensing and perception. We now, more than ever, need to harness the multi-dimensionality of senses to understand what we want our ‘new normal’ to be ‘filled with’ – from the places we call home, to the places we yearn to leave home for.

References

Images: Photo 1. Liam Sekis, Unsplash; Photo 2. Henry Dick, Unsplash; Photo 3. Kagan Bastimar, Pexels

Campbell, L. (2021). ‘Pleasure ripped out’: the people suffering long-term loss of taste after Covid. The Guardian – 27th January. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Cox, D. (2021). Anosmia: how Covid brought loss of smell centre stage. The Guardian – 5th December. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

de la Garza, A. (2021). Electric Cars Can Sound Like Anything. That’s a Huge Opportunity to Craft the Soundscape of the Future, Time Magazine – 6th April. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Garun, N. (2017). Tanvas’ haptic feedback system lets you feel texture on a touchscreen, The Verge – 5th January. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Lafleur, M. (2018). The End of Patient Centricity. Gemic. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Majid, A., Roberts, S.G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan. B., de Sousa H., Cansler, B.L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R.A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O., Brown, P., Hill, C., Le Guen, O., Hirtzel, V., van Gijn, R., Sicoli, M.A., and Levinson, S.C. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages, PNAS, 11(45), pp.11369-11376. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Metzinger, T.K.  (2018). Why Is Virtual Reality Interesting for Philosophers? Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(101), pp.1-19. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Patterson, S., Westfall, J.M., and Miller, B.F (2020). Projected deaths of despair from Covid-19, Wellbeing Trust. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Robson, D. (2021). Interoception: the hidden sense that shapes wellbeing. The Guardian – 15th August. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

The Financial (2021). Haptic Tech Turns Phones into Multi-Sensory Nature Learning Tools. The Financial – 2nd June. Last accessed: 20th September 2021

Conversations with Gems: Jun Lee, Partner

Posted on by Aija-Rose Farnill

This week, Jun Lee tells us about his role as a partner at Gemic, the importance of technology to the human experience, and why, going forward, the most successful companies will enable people to craft their own narratives and tell their own stories. Jun believes that narrative reached an inflection point in the 21st century with the rise of reality TV, where strong storytelling lost out to personality-driven content. In order to be successful now, he says, it’s time to put our faith back in building narratives.

To start out, could you tell us who you are and what your current role is at Gemic? 

My name is Jun Lee and I’m a partner at Gemic.

In your work at Gemic, what kinds of questions do you focus on? 

I’m interested in our relationship with technology and how it modifies and alters the experience of being human.

Something like the smartphone, for example, has insinuated into our everyday lives in profound ways. It’s eliminated the need for detailed planning from everyday life and has allowed us to be much more spontaneous.

So you think what’s more important is how technology changes us, rather than how we use it.

Yes, and it also changes the way we think about ourselves, about how we spend our time, and how we prioritize and delegate power and influence. Understanding technology is as important to understanding modern life as understanding food, health, work and family.

When did your interest in technology start?

When technology research switched from “what technology can do for us” to “what technology does to us”. I worked with someone who really inspired me to think about these questions differently than I had before.

Is there one seminal work that changed the way you think about the world?

The Real World on MTV.

That’s an interesting choice! Why The Real World?

Actually, it was the combination of The Real World, Cops, and Jerry Springer. They changed my view on the rules of narrative. These shows changed norms around what is a story and who creates stories. Effectively, it was a starting point for everything that we think about when it comes to social media and popular culture  today.

What we see in pop culture now is a shift – from an interest in narratives to an interest in personalities. A simple way to put it is, we’ve entered an era in which total strangers can be subjects of deep interest. In the past, stories were the subject of interest and those stories were told by narrators and storytellers who had established themselves as both skilled artisans and, to a degree, institutional authorities. 

In modern society we see a shift toward individualism, or individual experience, as the primary interest. When it comes to this sense of prioritizing individual values over communal ones, The Real World was the earliest signal of what we talk about as modern life.

What’s one big idea or shift you think everyone should be talking about?

I’d say the topic I get the most inspiration from right now is this gradual shift to individual narratives. 

Something I’m curious to understand is how we’ve taken apart traditional forms of narrative, and I’m not sure if we’ve figured out how to put them back together.

Jun Lee, Gemic Partner

I’ll give an example: we all find ourselves in what we call doom scrolls or those infinite stimulation loops. To use a food metaphor, it’s the equivalent of replacing your entire diet with appetizers. All content has been created to engage people, but its limitation is that it’s designed to entice you. 

Right, versus being designed to ‘nourish’ you or your mind?

The experience that we call exhaustion that comes from engaging with this kind of content is a result of the lack of a ‘beginning and end’ structure that used to define our media experiences. With this kind of short form content, there’s no real defined beginning or end – they either continue endlessly until they stop randomly, or become infinite variations on a theme. They are riffs, in the world of music or sketches — they’re things that are not complete. 

Consuming that as our primary form of entertainment or intellectual material leads to a fairly unhealthy mental state. There are some analogies here to good nutrition and diet, which is formed around a cyclical process of hunger and nourishment – you become hungry, you eat, you’re satisfied and that repeats each day. This kind of defined cyclical process doesn’t really exist in our current consumption of media. It’s just a life of snacking. 

This is also why you’ll see people going on “intermittent fasts” from social media or detoxing from their phones. You have to structure your own media experience, which is difficult to do.

What are the business implications of this idea?

Narratives shape our culture, politics and consumption behaviors. Today, we are awash in narratives that are the result of a lot of trial and error, experimentation and do-it-yourself ingenuity. While we may have empowered everyday people to tell their own stories, the results are really mixed. We talk about creating technologies that enable more people to tell their stories, but the reality is that most of these stories are not very compelling and worse, create a lot of noise, hype, scandal and anger without adding any cultural or social value. 

The irony is that those people who are self-taught. and able to produce compelling stories, are identified and brought into the world of professional storytelling. Many of today’s celebrated musicians, screenwriters and directors who people celebrate as modern self-taught storytellers are now in the professional storytelling business.

There’s an opportunity to help people participate in narrative creation – and also get better at it. They need to be given the tools to build narratives for themselves – narratives that help them engage socially and economically benefit from their efforts.

Jun Lee, Gemic Partner

Before we’re done here I want to ask you about Gemic generally – what do you think of Gemic’s role in the world? 

The way I think about what we do and how we think is that we offer a non-technocratic approach to thinking about human systems. 

What do you see as the drawbacks of a technocratic approach to studying human systems?

A technocratic view is kind of a distant analysis of the different layers of a system. It’s a dispassionate approach — the ideal outcome of this kind of thinking is that the researcher is a dispassionate observer. You look at the world as if you have no stake in it, or that you don’t really care what kind of outcome is going to come about. 

I would say that our role is to offer a different way of looking at the world. We lean heavily on a cultural and human lens. We examine how people decide to be and what they decide is good. And we think that human values should be the lead horse and that we should bet on it. 

So we offer a human systems view that is the opposite of a technocratic view. We lean heavily on the cultural perspective to both assess and diagnose what’s happening in society – and to successfully route it to a place where we want it to go. We’re using systems in a more motivated way to achieve cultural outcomes that we think are fit for people, fit for society, and that bring us closer together. It’s a biased view of the future with people at the center. 

What will the next year hold for Gemic, and for you at Gemic?

We’re always trying to find new ways of understanding the world and explain what’s  going on. We are busy, we’ve been growing, and we’re taking on a lot of different topics. We like to cycle between doing research grounded in real-world experiences and then reflecting on them more abstractly. 

What have we learned and engaged with over the past year that has changed the way we think? Asking these kinds of questions helps us improve our approach, taking what matters and discarding what doesn’t. So I hope the next year will hold some of that reflection and growth.

Jun is a Partner in Gemic’s New York Office, where he brings 20 years of experience in research & product development with focuses in communications, digital media use, automotive mobility, and home life. His career has been defined by a desire to understand why people embrace, reject, and in some cases, appropriate technologies in unanticipated ways. At Gemic, this translates into a desire to help companies reimagine the ways technology might change how people work, socialize, and connect to one another. Jun has a Master’s degree in Design from the Institute of Design and a BA in Neuroscience and Behavior from Columbia University. He has lived abroad in Seoul and Copenhagen before returning to New York.

The value of D&I in the consulting profession

Posted on by Aija-Rose Farnill

What drew you to the business consulting profession and to Gemic in particular? 

Pierre: “What drew me to strategy work and to work at Gemic in particular is that I feel that we’re not bound by industry insights. I feel that the best type of strategy is where we bring in both a diversity of industry logics and also a diversity of perspectives, whether it be social, cultural, economic, or political. And that is what really, really drew me to Gemic. Another term I also like to use is the unexpected intersections of people, places, and practices. And that’s where I feel we have a beautiful sort of symbiotic synthesis of all these different industries, cultures, people, places, and context of time coming together.”

Sofia: “I ended up in this industry through unexpected routes. I studied history as an undergraduate, and anthropology as a master’s. Both of those things were shaped by having a bicultural or multinational upbringing and being very aware that things that were taken for granted in one place are not natural, and are not even necessarily the best way to do things, which I think is easy to see when we’re socialized into only doing things in one way. Being in different countries and experiencing different ways made me really curious as to like all of the other potential ways that we could be living our lives, that we don’t know about and can’t even really imagine.”

Jehanne: “Living through and being able to witness these massive cultural changes and feeling at times that you are on the outside of a particular cultural reality or construct generates a curiosity about how the culture and societies and systems we live in come to be, and why they are the way they are. That resonates with me fully as being one of the drivers that led me into the consulting profession, especially the sort of human-centered work that we do at Gemic.”

What’s the value of having diverse perspectives, like ours, in this industry?

Sufyan: “We already live in a very diverse world. We just don’t live in a particularly inclusive world. I think part of our mission as an organization, that’s doing thinking for the future for positive impact, is to reflect the real diversity of the world so that businesses are better situated to make inclusive decisions and have inclusive strategies that end up reflecting the diverse society that we’re in today.”

Jana: “Our whole industry rests on the promise that we bring new perspectives, that we offer new innovative solutions. And so much of that promise is rooted in having an openness to different worldviews and different points of view. And I just wonder how much of that can be captured by a homogenous industry.”

Pierre: “If we think about diversity and inclusion, I think we must move towards a less siloed and more systemic view of what being diverse means, what being inclusive means. That is not just saying, okay, I have someone of a BIPOC ethnicity. Therefore I am inclusive. It is considering the interplay of socioeconomic background, geographic location, sexuality, ethnicity, and how all these interplay together to form an “identity” that needs to be interrogated. Yes, we need to have inclusion and accept all these different points of view as a first step. But I think the next step should be thinking of all these points of views not as isolated categories, but as very much integrated interrogations of where the world is now and where the world needs to be.”

Sofia: “I found it useful to conceptualize DEI as a sliding scale or different steps where there’s diversity, then inclusion, then equity as the ultimate goal. There’s this idea of an adverse incorporation, that you’re a part of it, but it’s not something that is benefiting you. Then there’s equity, which is about thinking about the various structural disadvantages that are in people’s background and seeking to elevate everyone relative to where they need that support. I think that’s the goal and frames a more considered way of talking about DEI.”

When it comes to business consulting, what are some of the barriers to entry for BIPOC candidates? 

Sofia: “This is still an industry that really valorizes elite or prestigious educational backgrounds, which we know are harder to access for people who face structural oppression. It’s also an industry, and we’ve been having a conversation about this fairly recently, that really values excellence or brilliance, but these are not really measurable characteristics. This means thinking through how we can broaden our expectations around educational backgrounds, how we can make sure that we’re de-biasing our assessment processes and not selecting for people that are like us.”

Pierre: “We have to tackle often very rooted structures of inequality that prevent these diverse voices, not just being hired, but also for their perspectives and experiences and opinions to matter in a hierarchical or workplace culture.”

How does Gemic cultivate a sense of diversity and inclusion amongst the team?

Serena: “I always feel like there’s a space for everybody to speak up and contribute. And even if you’re there to just listen to what everybody else has to say, I think that’s a really unique opportunity where people can freely talk to each other and build on each other’s ideas.”

Jehanne: “The culture of conversation is one of these key pillars for driving diverse and inclusive workplaces even when these conversations are hard to have and navigate.”

Jana: “I come from academia, and sometimes, conversations are treated like a competitive sport. You know, like who speaks the most, who speaks the loudest. And I think coming to Gemic, where people have been kind of open to hearing out these lived experiences and that are very different to your own – I think that’s been the most welcoming aspect of my experience with Gemic thus far. If our task is to diversify our views and our frameworks and our actions, then the first starting point is also diversifying the voices that we listen to.”

What’s your advice for BIPOC professionals interested in consulting and in the work we do here at Gemic? 

Pierre: “Don’t be afraid to laugh at yourself and (sometimes) laugh at the stereotypes that consulting brings. It’s the balance of being able to take yourself seriously, but also laugh at yourself and sharing that balance with others is especially important going into an industry as “serious” as consulting.”

Sufyan: “Be careful not to underestimate the importance of the atmosphere or environment that you choose to work in. Reflecting now and listening to all of our experiences of how we joined Gemic I’m reminded of how positive my initial impressions were of the Gems that I met and picking up on the organizational culture of curiosity and the flatness of hierarchy. Within the first couple of weeks of my internship, the sense that even as the most junior person in the room, my opinion and voice would be heard to the same degree as anyone else came through immediately.”

Jana: “Relax a little. I think this is especially important when you come from a lifelong outsider experience. You can relax when you enter a company like Gemic, where your “sense of otherness” is actually an asset and not something to be on guard about.”

Serena: “Coming into consulting, we might have the idea that, like a case interview, there’s a specific way that you should do it. Going through the Gemic interview process, I think it stands out in that we’re also looking for different things as well. Be yourself, add in your own unique perspective.”

Sofia: “Think about what matters to you and what you can contribute based on your experience as opposed to what you think consultants want you to say. Bringing what matters to you and your experiences makes it that much more meaningful and makes you stick out. It also means that if it doesn’t work out, at least you have the sense of integrity towards yourself.”